Article-Buzz ~ Free Article Directory
Category Index Article Index  Add your link Link Directory  Random Article Random Article  Search Search

Home | Health And Fitness

The Risks of not Using a Drinking Water Filter

A free article on Health and Fitness

By: Thomas Manso

Getting ready to buy drinking water filters? That's a great decision. Some people believe that a drinking water filter for their home is not a necessary expense. This is difficult to believe because they are not expensive, at all.

Drinking water filters are far less expensive than a personal computer or a television set. But, many people feel that those are "necessary" items. It is rare to find a household these days without a TV and a computer, but it's just as rare to see a house with a drinking water filter or filtration system.

Scientists and environmental groups keep warning governments about the dangers of chlorination, but the dangers of not chlorinating are real too. During the outbreak of cholera in Peru in 1991, health experts strongly suggested to local facilities to kill the cholera pathogen with chlorine. Because chlorination by-products or THMs increase the risk of cancer, local officials in Peru and other countries were resistant to use chorine.

In Canada, researchers recently estimated that 703 cancer cases per year were caused by exposure to THMs. Yet, about 10,000 people died from cholera between the months of January and February, 1991 in Peru.

Of course, THMs increase the risk of cancer and everyone should have showerhead and drinking water filters to reduce the risk. But, it is not wise to petition government agencies to stop chlorinating the water and it isn't practical either.

Chlorine is used nearly everywhere and government agencies try to control the amount of exposure as much as possible, but in reality no other disinfection method is as effective as chlorine. Buying a drinking water filter that removes chlorine and THMs is the sensible solution.

Water treatment facilities add chlorine, because if not algae will begin to grow in the pipes. Algae will not only affect the taste of water, but also other microorganisms that cause cholera and other waterborne illnesses would begin to thrive in the algae. These are very good reasons why treatment facilities couldn't use carbon filtration to remove the chlorine before the water leaves the facility.

Another recent study found unacceptable the risk to those who swim in chlorinated pools combined with exposure at home from drinking and showering, and that something should be done about it. But, the study failed to recommend that people should at least get showerheads and drinking water filters for their homes.

The water treatment facilities in the US are required to publish an annual water quality report. The Environmental Protection Agency asks them to include on the list chlorine, chloramines and THMs.

The facilities annual reports was required after a study in California showed that women who drink five or more glasses a day of ordinary tap water have a higher rate of miscarriage, possibly due to chlorine. One wonders, why didn't they suggest that pregnant women get a drinking water filter? It seems such an easy and inexpensive solution. It cost less than neo-natal vitamins.

Scientists want you to be aware of the risks and government officials expect you to make your own decisions. It just seems so logical to me, so go ahead you can get the best drinking water filters on the market for less than $125 and showerhead units cost even less. Don't you think your family's health is worth the investment?

Drinking water filters are far less expensive than a television or a personal computer. Yet many people feel that those are "necessities". It is rare to see a household these days without a TV and a computer, but it's just as rare to see a house with a drinking water filter on their tap.

Scientists and environmental groups warn governments about the dangers of chlorination, but the danger of not chlorinating is just as real. During the Peruvian cholera outbreak in 1991, health experts advised local facilities to use chlorine to kill the cholera pathogen. Local officials in Peru and other countries were resistant, because chlorination by-products or THMs increase the risk of cancer.

Researchers in Canada recently estimated that a total of 703 cancer cases per year were caused by exposure to THMs. But, 10,000 people died from cholera between the months of January and February, 1991 in Peru.

Yes, THMs increase the risk of cancer and everyone should have showerhead and drinking water filters to reduce the risk. But, don't petition government agencies to stop chlorinating the water. It just isn't practical.

Of course, chlorine is used nearly everywhere and government agencies try to control the amount of exposure as much as possible, but other disinfection methods are simply not as effective. Buying a point-of-use drinking water filter that removes chlorine and THMs is the only answer.

If treatment facilities do not add chlorine, algae will begin to grow in the pipes. Algae itself will affect the taste of water, but microorganisms that cause cholera and other waterborne illnesses would begin to flourish among the algae. I mention this in case you were wondering why treatment facilities couldn't use carbon filtration to remove the chlorine as the water leaves the facility.

Another recent study warns that the risk to those who swim in chlorinated pools, combined with exposure at home from drinking and showering, is "unacceptable" and "something should be done". Why don't they just advise swimmers to get showerhead and drinking water filters?

In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency now requires that facilities publish a quality report on an annual basis. On them, they list chlorine and chloramines, along with THMs.

They began to require facilities to do this the day after a California study showed that women who drink five or more glasses a day of ordinary tap water have a higher rate of miscarriage, possibly due to chlorine. Why don't they just suggest that pregnant women should use a drinking water filter? It's such a simple solution. It's less expensive than neo-natal vitamins.

Scientists want you to be aware of the risks and government officials want you to make the decision. It just seems logical to me. You can get the best drinking water filters on the market for less than $125 and showerhead units cost even less. Isn't your family's health worth the investment?

Information about the Author:

About The Author: Thomas Manso is passionate about the importance of using clean filtered water.Avoiding using tap water is very important, in most cases to enjoy better health. Please visit his site to read more about www.aquafaire.com ">water filtration system and the benefit of a www.aquafaire.com ">water filter system for your home and the benefit of your family.

Health and Fitness Articles: http://www.article-buzz.com



Print This Article
Add To Favorites
Email to Friends
Get Re-print Code

Click the XML Icon for 'Health and Fitness' Articles RSS feed


[Search]  [Directory]  [Store]  [Tools]  [Blogspot]  [Featured Articles]  [Oto Goldmine]

© 2005-2008 Article-Buzz
Use of our free service is protected by our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service

Powered by Article Dashboard